How the Ante-Nicene Christians Interpreted Scripture

In today’s theological world, interpretation of Scripture often gets filtered through denominational lenses, academic traditions, or philosophical frameworks. But the early Christians—those who lived before the Council of Nicaea—read Scripture much differently. Their understanding wasn’t shaped by seminaries or systematic theologies, but by discipleship, persecution, and the Holy Spirit.

Before creeds were formalized and councils held power, these believers leaned wholly on the authority of God’s written Word and the Spirit who breathed it.

---

Scripture Was Final, Not Evolving

To the Ante-Nicene Christians, the canon of Scripture was not a work in progress. While the formal list of New Testament books wasn’t ratified until later, the early church already treated the apostolic writings as divinely authoritative.

“The Scriptures are indeed perfect, since they were spoken by the Word of God and His Spirit.”
— Irenaeus, Against Heresies 2.28.2

They didn’t see the need for developing theology—because they believed the Word was sufficient. Their task was not to add to it or systematize it, but to live it out faithfully.

---

Interpretation Through the Holy Spirit, Not Human Systems

The early Christians believed the Holy Spirit was the Teacher of the Church.

“But the anointing that you received from Him abides in you, and you have no need that anyone should teach you… His anointing teaches you about everything.”
— 1 John 2:27

Their writings reflect constant prayer, fasting, and humility in seeking to understand God’s Word—not reliance on external traditions or evolving doctrines.

This wasn’t individualism or rebellion—it was a Spirit-led submission to the authority of Scripture. They trusted that the same Spirit who inspired the Word could also illuminate it to every believer, not just to elite teachers.

---

They Interpreted Literally—Unless the Text Was Clearly Symbolic

These believers took the words of Jesus and the Apostles seriously. When Jesus said “love your enemies,” they didn’t allegorize it. They practiced it—often to the death. Their lives bore literal obedience to commands like:

• Blessed are the persecuted
• Do not resist an evil person
• Give to those who ask
• Turn the other cheek

They believed the commands of Christ were meant to be lived, not just admired.

Allegorical interpretation only appeared later, influenced by thinkers like Origen and Clement of Alexandria—men who were shaped more by Greek philosophy than by the simple obedience of the early church.

---

The Word Was Lived in Community

Scripture wasn’t read and interpreted in isolation. The early church gathered in homes, read aloud the Gospels and Epistles, and submitted to one another as they sought the Spirit’s guidance. Even without formal education, they understood the power and clarity of God’s Word.

“Let us therefore hold steadfastly and unceasingly to our hope and the guarantee of our righteousness, who is Jesus Christ… Let us look steadfastly to Him.”
— Clement of Rome, 1 Clement 36

They didn’t see themselves as theologians—but as servants. The goal was not intellectual mastery, but transformation and obedience.

---

What We Can Learn Today

1. The Holy Spirit is still the best teacher of Scripture.
2. Literal obedience matters more than theological precision.
3. Faithful community fosters clarity.
4. Doctrinal systems must be tested against the plain reading of the Word.

---

A Warning for Today’s Church

Many today no longer trust the plain reading of Scripture—preferring the interpretations of scholars, theologians, or movements. But if the early church had followed such systems, the gospel would never have spread. It was their simple, radical trust in the Word and the Spirit that shook the world.

Let’s return to that simplicity—where God’s Word is enough, and His Spirit leads us into all truth.

---

Sources:

• The Holy Bible — 1 John 2:27
• Irenaeus, Against Heresies, 2.28.2
• Clement of Rome, 1 Clement 36
• Acts 2:42; John 14:26